Windows 2000 Is Not A Bad OS!
10 Responses to “Windows 2000 Is Not A Bad OS!”Leave a ReplyPosted on January 16th, 2008 by admin Filed under Windows 2000 | 10 Comments » |
|
|
|
|
Windows 2000 Is Not A Bad OS!
10 Responses to “Windows 2000 Is Not A Bad OS!”Leave a ReplyPosted on January 16th, 2008 by admin Filed under Windows 2000 | 10 Comments » |
|
Windows 2000 is really good. I just talk about it.
what encoder do you …
what encoder do you use? and when you put it as our default encoder do you change some of the video settings in camstudio?
Of course you can …
Of course you can use ie, wmp and firefox if the os is the base of xp. Yes 2000 is xp without some of the xp services, resources and eye candy. XP flourished so much because of directx 9. I used 2000 for about 5 years and it was great.
i used the h264 …
i used the h264 encode i will be using it from now on
disagree i hated …
disagree i hated 2000 lost a lot of data due to NTDLR bs.
XP was a departure …
XP was a departure of what can be called “windows classic” and is one major reason for its success over 2k
I was searching …
I was searching other things and I arrived here… err, just one thing, as already one commented to you, XP is just 2000.
2000 runs great, of course!!!! It is the base of XP without the “trash” that comes with XP.
I’m using it now over 6 years now after years of use of NT 4.0 and I don’t change them for XP… for millions of reasons.
I think Windows …
I think Windows Millennium had such a bad name, it tinted Windows 2000.
Windows 2000 is …
Windows 2000 is pretty good I agree. In fact I might just go run it virtually.
how in the world …
how in the world did u get to autopan on the virtual machine? where did you get teh plugins?
you talk like u …
you talk like u were chewin gum the whole time